Question: Does every group of like-minded deranged individuals have an official organization? Or, is it just the psychopathic predators that target children, who feel the need to organize?

Pedophiles have NAMBLA and those that view children as inconvenient or punishments have NARAL. The disgusting membership of one seeks to use children for their sexual pleasure while the disgusting membership of the other seek to kill children that result from sexual pleasure. Both organizations advocate harming children, the main differentiating factor is the age of the victim… that is assuming of course, that NARAL members have some upper age limit for slaughter. This might not be the case, however, since the type of individual that views the decision to kill the baby in the womb (or allow a born baby to die unattended should be the sole discretion of the mother) could reasonably believe that any killing is acceptable as long as the victim’s mother has given consent. This latter point of view could provide a permanent solution to behavior problems at liberal day care centers.

I don’t know if NAMBLA is supporting Barack The Baby Killer for president (and I refuse to go to their web-site to find out) but NARAL proudly supports Obama and his proposed policy, “No Child Left Behind… Unless It Is In A Soiled Linen Closet At A Hospital/Abortion Mill Associated With Trinity United.”

What would these organizations be without vocal advocates? My answer is, thankfully silent, but that is not the case. The culture of perversion and innocent death represented by such organizations are indeed nurtured by their champions. One champion of innocent death is Slate.com editor Dahlia Lithwick, whose Thursday offering, “Abortion Contortion: John McCain bets the farm that women aren’t listening,” serves as a disappointing reminder of the evil and ignorance that influences politics. Dahlia Mistress Of Death writes:

Voters, and especially women voters who want to make their own reproductive decisions, need to wake up and smell the asparagus. In July, for example, a Pew poll showed that 56 percent of the electorate didn’t know where McCain stood on abortion. Listen up, because he’s telling us now. To the extent McCain was ever independent-minded at all on reproductive rights, he’s not anymore. In 2000, McCain begged Bush to amend language in the GOP platform, which calls for a human-life amendment banning all abortions and provides no exceptions for rape, incest, or danger to the life of the mother. This week he indicated that he won’t work to change that platform. That’s a position espoused by fewer than 20 percent of the electorate. In the religion forum last weekend at Saddleback Church in California, McCain announced that life begins “at the moment of conception” and promised, “I will be a pro-life president, and this presidency will have pro-life policies.” In April he told Chris Matthews that “the rights of the unborn is one of my most important values.” He has bragged about his consistent zero rating from NARAL. He has explicitly said that his Supreme Court choices will be animated by his desire to overturn Roe.

Does Dahlia support the death penalty for the rapist in the event of rape, or does she believe the only involved party deserving the harshest of sentences is the baby?

Why is it that these people use such misleading language as “reproductive choices?” It is obvious to anyone that cares to view the situation honestly that anti-abortion does not equate to anti-choice. The choice to engage in sexual activity, just like the choice to take steps to avoid pregnancy are separate from the choice to kill a baby. This “lady” chooses to mislead then complains about information being given to abortion seekers as dishonest:

So much of the abortion debate involves treating women like children. It was bad enough when Justice Anthony Kennedy told women last year that we are too unstable to be trusted with decisions about what to do with our own bodies. It is an outrage that physicians in South Dakota are being instructed to lie to us for our own good.

Dahlia should be thankful that the abortion debate does not involve “treating women like children” as she so dishonestly claims. If it did and NARAL’s position on children were respected, the abortion debate would involve killing women! I am sure neither NARAL nor NAMBLA would want to receive the treatment they promote for innocent children. Obviously any debate that involves a participant having her skull pierced and her brain vacuumed out would be hard to stomach and probably wouldn’t be aired by most news channels no matter how much the program directors thought it might help the candidacy of Barack Obama.

As the cable news channels show gripping footage of Democrat vice presidential pick Joe Biden’s Delaware home, the Obammunists know they have found the perfect running mate. Michelle’s husband wants to be complimented as well as complemented by his future third in command. I think this pick was determined in February of 2007 when Joe Biden offered his evaluation of “The One.” From cnn.com:

“I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy,” Biden said. “I mean, that’s a storybook, man.”

That is four compliments in one sentence, which is obviously a compliment to sentence ratio that “Big Brother” Barry appreciates.

The Obammunists must also appreciate Senator Joe “7-11″ Biden’s willingness to sacrifice and accept a position he doesn’t want, disciple to Michelle’s Messiah. On “Meet The Press” June 22, 2008 , Biden expressed his desire to NOT be asked to be the running mate:

SEN. BIDEN:  Unlike most other people, I’m being straight with you.  If asked, I will do it.  I’ve made it clear I do not want to be asked.

MR. WILLIAMS:  Do not want to be asked.  But if asked, the answer, of course, would be yes.

SEN. BIDEN:  Of course it would, because the–if the president–if the presidential nominee thought I could help him win, am I going to say to the first African-American candidate about to make history in the world that, “No, I will not help you out like you want me to”?  Of course, I’m–I’ll say yes.

The Obama campaign could not pass up someone that would so selflessly accept the position of third banana, even though he didn’t want to be asked. The Delaware senator further sealed the deal on “Meet The Press” that day by again injecting race into the race, which The libiots fully intend to make about race.

There could be some rough patches ahead for “Team Articulate And Bright And Clean” as evidenced by the musings of some libiot pro-baby killing advocates at  Democratic Underground, who see Biden’s view that life begins at conception as potentially troublesome. These champions of infanticide, who had the perfect candidate in Barack “Born Alive, Let Them Die” Obama, are worried about a potential tie-breaking vote in The Senate falling to someone that doesn’t like the idea of partially delivering a viable baby, puncturing the base of his or her skull, and vacuuming out his or her gray matter.

Is it possible that “Big Brother” Barry isn’t aware of Senator Biden’s view that a “bay-buh” might not be a punishment? Could it be that Barry doesn’t know that Biden actually has grandchildren that weren’t aborted?

At the very least, Michelle’s husband and Joe “7-11″ Biden can agree that our economy must be further damaged for the sake of The Prophet Gore’s anthropogenic global warming scam. This point is important because the more jobs the libiots can eliminate through tax and regulation means, the more victims there will be to depend on a benevolent government.  Obammunism needs these dependents in order to prosper and grow.

Team Articulate And Bright And Clean must not lose sight of the ultimate goal, which is base in the work of Marx and illustrated in the work of Orwell. “Big Brother” Barry will be watching.

Cross-posted from Conservative Common Man (my other blog.)

In a time when the liberal media should be rejoicing in their impending presidential victory (regardless of which sub-par candidate wins) or focusing on their primary task of campaigning for “Big Brother” Barry Obama, they still get distracted by the perceived unjust treatment of lawbreakers. Both presidential candidates are open-borders, no sovereignty type guys, but apparently the lib media doesn’t think that is good enough. You see, illegal aliens are being caught currently and their sad tales must be told. Imagine the horror that the most recently detained illegals faced, they could not attend the wedding reception for Ellen and “Ally McBeal’s” Nell (the other newsworthy garbage in The San Francisco Chronicle.) Actually, most of the illegals in Iowa probably wouldn’t have made the trip out of “the shadows” to attend the gay (that means happy, right?) couple’s nuptials.

The AP article in the San Francisco Chronicle is heart-wrenchingly headlined, “Small town Iowa struggles after immigration raid.” A gut response might be, “so what?” There is no valid reason for a town to struggle because of an immigration raid. Those that claim otherwise conveniently ignore the most basic fact, illegal is illegal. If there are jobs to be done, they can be done by people that are here “legally”, which means those without the “il” as a prefix to their status. Perhaps the business owners should pay higher wages and subsequently charge more, or perform the tasks themselves… oh shoot, I used common sense there. Forgive me, it is a bad habit of mine.

More

Billy Crystal, the libiot Hillary supporter would be so proud that one of his characters seems to have inspired the “conservative” faction of the Demoncratic Party to accept the new platform on abortion. Like Miracle Max and his assessment of Wesley (The Princess Bride,) “only mostly dead” appears to be good enough for the most moral of the Demoncrats when it comes to the fate of the most innocent.

The Trail, a Washington Post campaign blog has the distasteful details in the entry, “Conservative Dems Hail Party Platform’s New Abortion Plank.”

New plank:

The Democratic Party strongly and unequivocally supports Roe v Wade and a woman’s right to choose a safe and legal abortion, regardless of ability to pay, and we oppose any and all efforts to weaken or undermine that right.The Democratic Party also strongly supports access to affordable family planning services and comprehensive age-appropriate sex education which empower people to make informed choices and live healthy lives. We also recognize that such health care and education help reduce the number of unintended pregnancies and thereby also reduce the need for abortions. The Democratic Party also strongly supports a woman’s decision to have a child by ensuring access to and availability of programs for pre and post natal health care, parenting skills, income support, and caring adoption programs.

That was so life-respecting and generous to add the little afterthought at the end to appease the pro-life portion of their party, or at least the members of their party that claim to be pro-life. Leave it “Big Brother” Barry and his ilk to be appeasers, I just never thought the most pro-baby death Senator in The Senate would agree to such a plank. The last sentence in the plank must be for Democrats whose daughters get “punished with a baby (pronounced baybuh in Barry’s come and go accent.)”

More from supposed moral Demoncrats:

On a conference call Tuesday, a half-dozen anti-abortion pro-Democratic thinkers and religious leaders claimed victory for the party’s new abortion plank, which they said took a big step in their direction by more explicitly stating the party’s support for women who choose to carry their pregnancies to term. By doing so, they said, the Democrats were moving closer to the middle ground where most Americans reside — not wanting to criminalize abortions, but wanting to reduce the number performed.

“There’s a common ground possible here,” said Rev. Jim Wallis, the founder of Sojourners, the country’s largest network of liberal Christians. “It’s never been as explicitly stated that the Democratic Party supports a woman’s decision to have their child, and offers her practical support to have her child. It’s an historic step forward.” He added, “This plank makes room for people with moral convictions about abortion…. A lot of people are going to find their convictions represented here.”

Translation: We prefer that babies not be killed, but it isn’t really all that important to us. As long as we are shown a little respect and credited with a softening of the traditional (modern) Democratic Party motto of “An Abortion In Every Pot,” we’ll be satisfied and will be able to support the man that killed the “Born Alive Protection Act” in The Illinois Senate with a clear collective conscience!

I guess a pro-life Demoncrat could be compared to:

• A PETA supporting vegetarian that wears leather shoes
• An eco-conscious celebrity that jets across the globe and complains about carbon emissions
• A politician that calls for taxing “windfall” profits of oil companies, but not those of Hollywood entities
• A candidate that campaigns on poverty while living in a 28,000 square foot house
• A person that cries “keep your laws off my body” then expects government to take over healthcare, which would presumably involve the person’s body

To borrow Barack Obama’s most commonly uttered two words, “Ya know,” I think the candidate that has no core principles is a perfect fit for the type of “pro-life” person that can so easily find abortion acceptable.

The Washington Post might be the odds-on favorite for the D.C. base of “Big Brother” Barry’s “Ministry Of Truth,” but The L.A. Times is a leading contender for “The Left Coast Satellite Ministry.” Op-Ed writer Neal Gabler takes offense to the characterization of “The One” as a rock star. Apparently movie stars and Kennedies are deeper than rock stars and the emotional connections with their adoring fans are much stronger. Gabler’s five-star review of “Obamunism, Episode ” seeks to explain why feelings over thought should carry the vote for an Obamanation. This thinly veiled campaign ad is titled:

His ‘celebrity’ comes from an emotional identity with voters, not from ‘rock star’ hysteria.

Like all cliches, this one has some truth and a lot more gas. The last time the media carted out this theme was 40 years ago, when Robert Kennedy, running for president, attracted the same sort of frenzied adulation and also threatened to upset the political apple cart by assembling a coalition of the young, the disenfranchised and the well-educated. But for Obama and for Bobby, the characterization is insulting and

imprecise. It is insulting because it suggests that their devotees’ effusions are just a visceral reaction — the political equivalent of puppy love. And it is imprecise because Obama is — and Bobby was — more movie star than rock star, which is an analogy with a difference. Rock stars, with some glaring exceptions, typically whip up the crowd; the thrill tends to be short-lived. Movie stars, by contrast, tend to create a long-standing emotional identification with their audience. It’s a difference that may have a bearing on the outcome of this election as voters weigh the advantages of being a movie star against its disadvantages. Movie stardom can be confused with mere celebrity, which has connotations of insubstantiality.

Obama faces that obstacle too. It is the downside of being a star. What this election may finally come down to is a choice between politics and movie stardom, between the safety of what we think we know and the expansiveness of what we dream, or, in more prosaic terms, between good old John Wayne and the less predictable but more exciting Will Smith. In any case, rock stars need not apply.

“Summer lovin’, had me a blast…Summer lovin”, happened so fast…”

Roughly 30 years after the movie “Grease” hit the silver screen, the lyrics from one of its songs have renewed meaning. This Summer Americans are witness to a great romance between the parrot press and Barry Obama.

(I began this post last night and today I was listening to the podcast of yesterday’s Laura Ingraham Show, during which they beat me to the punch and played a snippet of “Summer Lovin’.” So I will include a portion of another appropriate song.)

“If lovin’ you is wrong, I don’t wanna be right.”

There is little risk of the amore stricken media ever being “right.” “Journalists” from all forms of traditional media seem to be experiencing something similar to the “tingle” that runs up Spitball’s Chris Mathews’ leg at the sound of Barry Obama’s melodious (or is it malodorous?) voice. It must be love if so many reporters can view this man as an inspirational and eloquent speaker. They say love is blind, but it must also be deaf because unless he is reading a prepared speech, the media’s Messiah can’t seem to string three words together. Not to mention the fact that he is completely disassociated from the truth or reality and it doesn’t seem to register with the fawning, eyelash batting reporters.

You won’t hear about the eloquent one’s many gaffes, self-contradictions, lies, and stammers unless you listen to talk radio or rely on the internet. In a sane society, the intentional misleading of the public regarding the quality, character, and words of a presidential candidate in order to enable the candidate to be elected, might be viewed as wrong. Of course, that would be judgmental and we all know that it is wrong to scrutinize or pass judgment… unless someone makes a suggestion such as babies should be allowed to live, then judgment is acceptable and necessary to stone the infidel that commits blasphemy at the altar of liberalism’s most holy sacrament!

Mark Levin played an enlightening portion of “His Holiness” Saint Barack’s speech in Israel. You aren’t likely to get this from his future Ministry of Information (today referred to as the MSM,) so you could visit National Review On-line to learn about the lies of a savior. From Andy McArthy’s piece “Messiah Lies About His Senate Committee Assignment:”

At Powerline, John Hinderaker goes through Obama’s continuing contortions (in Israel) over how Jerusalem must remain the undivided capitol of Israel, unless of course it is divided and unless of course it is also the capitol of “Palestine,” which possibilities absolutely positively mark no change in the messiah’s original decree, which he really really meant, that Jerusalem must remain the undivided capitol of Israel. Obama then continued (italics mine):

Now, in terms of knowing my commitments, you don’t have to just look at my words, you can look at my deeds. Just this past week, we passed out of the U.S. Senate Banking Committee, which is my committee, a bill to call for divestment from Iran, as a way of ratcheting up the pressure to ensure that they don’t obtain a nuclear weapon.

John explains the rest:

But Obama is not a member of the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee. Obama just made that up so he could count the committee’s action as one of “my deeds.”

Perhaps The Obamination has bought his own hype and he believes that he has already been ordained Supreme Ruler of this downright mean (Michelle’s observation) country of ours. If this is the case, it would make sense that he could call the banking committee his, as all government functions would belong to the being that transcends such small things as a republican form of government.

USA Today lovingly took their candidate to task, albeit in gentle style regarding his refusal to admit that “The Surge” worked. The writer gives credit to the troops and General Petraeus and points out more than once how wrong it was to go to Iraq to begin with before ending with sage advice for “Big Brother” Barry and his opponent:

Perhaps it’s too much to ask that Obama risk being taunted by headlines such as “Obama says Bush was right.” But for the nation to move forward on its single most vexing debate, it would help if the next president could admit the obvious — whether that’s Republican John McCain conceding that it was a terrible blunder to invade Iraq in the first place, or Obama acknowledging that the surge has worked better than he expected.

Americans don’t expect their president to be right all the time. They do expect him to change course when he’s proved wrong.

One really must wonder how awful a candidate Obama must actually be given how close the polls are in spite of his thousands of unpaid campaign staff members in the nations news rooms. Perhaps the eternal candidate can’t be bothered with the details of the office to which he was unfortunately (for his constituents) elected so I will offer the following aid to his highness:

Committee Assignments

Senate Foreign Relations Committee

Write to the Committee:

U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations
Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510-6225

Call the Committee:

Majority Phone: (202) 224-4651
Minority Phone: (202) 224-3953

---

Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

Write to the Committee:

412 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC. 20510

Call the Committee:

Democratic Staff (202) 224-9126
Republican Staff (202) 224-2074

---

Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

Write to the Committee:

428 Senate Dirksen Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

Call the Committee:

Phone (202) 224-5375

---

Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

Write to the Committee

340 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510

Call the Committee

Democratic Staff (202) 224-2627
Republican Staff (202) 224-4751

If the dope of hope would refer to the preceding list before he opens his script amplification orifice, he might sound like less of a fool to those of us that actually pay attention. I guess a bright side to an Obama presidency would be that he likely wouldn’t remember which nation he serves. Oh wait, I forgot, Obammmunism is for the entire planet, not just this “downright mean” nation.

I received this in an e-mail. It would be a lot funnier if it there wasn’t so much truth to it!

« Previous Entries